Roof insurance claims, from the homeowner’s side

None of this is legal or coverage advice, and it is deliberately not written as though we know what your policy says. It is a description of the machinery, so that the parts of it that surprise homeowners stop being surprising.

In Jurupa Valley the failure that leads is sun, which does more here than rain ever will, and that shapes what a claim here usually looks like. Sun is the main wear here. Asphalt loses its oils, underlayment goes brittle, and sealant beads shrink away from the flashing.

The sequence, start to finish

There are roughly seven steps and they do not reorder. Document the damage. Make it safe. Report it to the insurer. Meet the adjuster. Receive a scope and an estimate. Have the work done. Submit proof of completion if your policy holds back depreciation until then. Every step depends on the one before it having been done properly, which is why the first one — photographs, before anything is touched — carries more weight than it looks like it should.

Homeowners tend to think the adjuster visit is the decisive moment. It is not. The decisive moment is the hour after the storm, when the evidence either gets recorded or does not.

Evidence, before anything else

Take four times as many pictures as feel necessary and make sure the dates are intact — most phones record this automatically, and it is worth checking rather than assuming. Include something for scale in the close shots. Photograph the gutters, the vent caps and the downspouts as well as the roof itself, because soft metal records an impact more legibly than a shingle does.

Alongside the photographs, keep a plain written note of what happened and when: the date and rough time of the storm, when you first noticed the damage, who you called and what they said. A dated contemporaneous note is worth a great deal more than a recollection three months later.

What to have ready:

• Receipts for tarps, emergency call-outs and anything else spent making it safe
• Dated photographs taken before anything was moved, cleared or covered
• Photographs of undamaged sections of the same roof, for comparison
• The contractor’s written assessment, if you have had one done
• Interior photographs, including the attic and the underside of the deck
• A dated written note of what happened, when, and who you spoke to
• Any paperwork from when the roof was last replaced or repaired

The inspection, from the adjuster’s side

An adjuster is not deciding whether your roof is old. They are deciding two things: whether the damage was caused by a peril the policy covers, and whether it happened during the policy period. Everything they do on the roof serves those two questions. They will look for a consistent pattern of damage on the slopes facing the weather, for damage to soft metal that corroborates the story, and for signs that the roof was already failing before the event.

The word that decides most claims is "sudden". Damage that is clearly the result of one event is covered; wear, deterioration, poor maintenance and long-term leaks generally are not, and are usually excluded in so many words.

Two settlement bases, and the difference is most of the cheque

There are two ways a policy can pay. Replacement cost value pays what it costs to put the roof back today. Actual cash value pays that same figure minus depreciation for the age and condition of the roof — and on a roof two-thirds of the way through its life, depreciation can be most of the money. Which one you have is written on your declarations page, and it is worth knowing before you file rather than after.

This one line in the policy is usually the difference between a claim that pays for a roof and a claim that pays for part of one. It is not negotiable after the fact; it is what you bought.

Who you let on the roof after a storm

Widespread damage brings crews from out of state within days. Some are competent and some are not, and the ones that matter are the ones who will not be reachable in three years when a workmanship problem appears. The single most useful test is not price: it is whether the company was working in this area before the storm and will be after it.

Nothing needs to be signed on a doorstep. A contractor who cannot leave a written proposal and come back tomorrow is telling you something about how the rest of the job will go.

Reasons to end the conversation:

• An assignment of benefits presented as routine paperwork rather than as what it is
• A request for a large payment up front, before materials are delivered or work begins
• A refusal to put the scope in writing, itemised
• Pressure to sign anything today, or a discount that expires this afternoon
• Any offer to describe old damage as part of the new event
• An offer to waive, absorb, discount or rebate your deductible — this is fraud, and it is the clearest signal there is

Making it safe, and getting paid for having done so

Do what is necessary to stop water entering, spend no more than that, keep every receipt and photograph the work both before and after. Those four things together turn mitigation from an expense into a documented, reimbursable part of the claim, and they take about an extra ten minutes.

If a contractor does the emergency work, get a separate written invoice for it rather than folding it into the main job. Separated out, it is straightforward to claim; buried in a re-roof invoice, it usually is not.

Deductibles — including the separate one for wind and hail

Your deductible is your share of the loss, and it is a term of the contract rather than a suggestion. It is worth being blunt about what follows from that: a contractor who offers to waive it, absorb it, discount it, "work with you on it", eat it, or cover it with a rebate or a free upgrade is proposing insurance fraud, and in most states that is a criminal offence for both of you. It is prosecuted in roofing more than in any other trade, precisely because the offer is made so often after storms.

The mechanism is straightforward and so is the illegality: the contractor bills the insurer for the full amount while collecting less than the full amount from you, which means the invoice sent to the insurer is false. The homeowner who agreed to it is a party to that. No amount of friendly framing on a doorstep changes what it is.

Repair, replace, and the matching problem

The word to know is "matching". If a repair would leave a visibly mismatched roof, some policies and some state regulations require a reasonably uniform appearance, which pushes the scope from a slope towards the whole roof. Whether that applies to you depends on your policy and your state, and it is a real question to raise rather than a trick.

Discontinued products come into it too. A shingle line that is no longer manufactured cannot be matched at any price, and that fact — evidenced, not asserted — often does more to move a scope than any argument about aesthetics.

The clock, in both directions

Two clocks run and only one of them is obvious. The visible one is how long the insurer takes: most states set regulatory deadlines for acknowledging a claim, for deciding it, and for paying once it is accepted, and these are usually counted in days rather than months. Your state insurance department publishes the actual numbers, and they are enforceable.

The other clock is yours, and it is the one that ends claims. Policies require prompt notice of a loss and set an outer limit on how long after the event you can report it. Damage discovered late — hail in particular, because it hides — is denied on this basis more often than on any question about the damage itself.

What to do when the answer is no

A denial has to be in writing and it has to give reasons, usually citing the specific policy provision relied on. That letter is the most useful thing in the file, because it tells you exactly what has to be answered. Read it against your policy and identify which of three things has happened: the insurer does not accept the damage exists, does not accept the cause is covered, or does not accept the amount.

Those are three different problems with three different answers, and treating a denial as one undifferentiated "no" is why so many are never successfully challenged.

The short version

Document first, make it safe second, report third, and get the scope in writing before anybody starts work. In that order it usually goes smoothly. In any other order it usually does not.